Texas and Illinois will compete for the worlds first
near-zero-emissions coal power plant, a $1 billion project headed by the
U.S. Department of Energy and a consortium of 10 energy companies from
the United States, China and Australia. The Energy Department and the consortium announced Tuesday that two
sites from each state will vie for the project known as FutureGen, a
plant designed to turn coal into a hydrogen-rich gas to produce
electricity for about 275,000 single-family homes.
The project dates to 2003 when President Bush announced the need for
FutureGen to address global warming and touted technologies that would
capture carbon dioxide for other uses. Those include fertilizers or
liquefying the gas to inject it into old oil wells and push remaining
oil or natural gas to the surface. The process would not release into the atmosphere pollutants usually
associated with coal-burning plants, such as carbon dioxide. Scientists
have blamed the burning of fossil fuels as one of the main causes of
global warming.
Sites in Mattoon and Tuscola in Illinois and near Odessa and in Jewett
in Texas, beat out eight other candidates. The winner will be announced
in September 2007 and will be operating a facility deemed the "ultimate
power plant" almost five years later. "This project makes coal, one of the most abundant fossil energies in
the world, available in the future in the face of growing concern over
greenhouse gas emissions and climate change," said Jeff Jarrett, the
Energy Departments assistant secretary of fossil energy.
The selection committee, known as FutureGen Alliance, declined to
discuss specific criteria that produced a final four until they had
talked to those who did not make the cut. But Mike Mudd, chief executive
for FutureGen, identified strengths of each. Jewett s site in Central Texas is 400 acres, more than twice the
minimum, and sits near existing industry transmission lines.
The site near Odessa features 600 acres of land, transmission lines
within two miles and thick sandstone that ensures long-term carbon
dioxide storage. Mattoon s site needs only minimal grading, has a primary water supply
from waste water treating plants and thick sandstone. Tuscola s case is strong because of proximity to three railroads, all
within 1.5 miles of the site, and the thick sandstone.
Texas is putting up $20 million to the FutureGen alliance for use on
infrastructure or development. Additionally, a new law indemnifies the
alliance of any legal entanglements arising from the plants carbon
dioxide. Illinois officials said they re ready to back up their candidates with
up to $80 million in incentives on the table, from grants to
low-interest loans.
Plans call for the 275-megawatt plant to capture most of its emissions
of carbon dioxide and inject them permanently into underground
reservoirs, a process called sequestration. FutureGen wants to measure the progress of the finalists proposals next
week in Pittsburgh. The FutureGen Alliance has already committed more than $250 million to
the project. The U.S. government is putting up about $700 million. In
addition to commitments from energy companies, the governments of South
Korea and India have pledged $10 million each. Sites not making the cut were: Effingham and Marshall, Ill.; Henderson
County, Ky.; Bowman County, N.D.; Meigs and Tuscarawas counties in Ohio;
Point Pleasant, W.Va.; and Gillette, Wyo.
(Por Steve Quinn,
Environmentla News Network, 27/07/2006)