China, the world s top rice producer and consumer, is unlikely to give
its nod for commercial production of genetically modified rice at least
until next year with a government panel demanding more data to prove its
safety. Scientists in China said the biosafety committee -- which
examines the safety of genetically modified crops for the government --
fell short of supporting large scale production of insect resistant Bt
rice at its bi-annual meeting late in June.
Instead, the panel has recommended transgenic papaya, which could become
the first GMO crop in seven years to pass Beijings scrutiny for
commercialisation. "There has been no agreement on any commercialisation of rice," said Lu Baorong of Shanghais Fudan University, who is a member of the
committee. "The requirements are getting harder."
Early in 2005 China looked set to approve commercial production of a
disease resistant GMO rice, known as Xa21 rice, paving the way for the
worlds first large scale planting of a GMO crop for direct human
consumption. But Beijing has hit the brakes following reports of illegal sales of GMO
rice in China. The reports sounded alarm bells also in Chinas top
trading partners.
While more and more farmers around the world have shifted to GMO
varieties in the past 10 years, cotton, corn, soybeans and rapeseed
account for almost all of the transgenic crops currently grown
commercially. "It is still far from commercialisation," said Dayuan Xue, a professor
from the Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, referring to
transgenic rice. "Its not possible this year. Maybe they may consider
it next year."
The Chinese scientists said it would take a year or two to collect data
which the committee had now asked for to decide if Bt rice was safe for
the environment and human consumption. Even then, the government in China might not go ahead immediately,
especially if uncertainties remain about whether its trading partners
would accept the biotech crop, they said.
For the same reasons, US farmers have so far refrained from planting
herbicide resistant GMO rice, known as Liberty Link rice, for which
Washington has given already the green light. "The government takes different aspects into account, not just the
biosafety data," said another scientist member of the committee, who
declined to be indentified.
"They also have to consider political, economic and trade matters. It is
a complicated issue."
PAPAYA, PEST MUTATION
But the committee saw no safety problems for production of genetically
modified papaya, resistant to ring spot virus that often causes
devastation in China as well as other producing countries, such as
Thailand and Taiwan. "They feel that it is relatively safe at this moment," Lu said, adding
Beijing might approve its commercialisation late this year or in early
2007.
The scientists said that GMO papaya, developed in the southern province
of Guangdong, used a different technology from the variety developed and
released in Hawaii since 1998. Looking to the future of GMO rice in China, Angus Lam from Greenpeace
said chances of Beijing approving the crop would rise if the European
Union allowed imports of Liberty Link rice.
This would send a signal on the acceptability of transgenic rice in Europe. "The decision will be made in a global context. Local scandals might be
only a part of the consideration," he said, referring to illegal sales
of Bt rice, which Greenpeace has said found its way into baby food
manufactured in China. The scientists said one of the biggest concerns for the biosafety
committee was possible mutation of pests to develop resistance to the Bt
toxin, originally derived from bacteria.
China is already the world s top grower of Bt cotton, which it
introduced in 1997. About 70 percent of its 2006 cotton acreage is
estimated to be of the transgenic variety. "So far, we have not found insects developing resistance," said the
scientist who did not want to be identified. "But we have to monitor
this carefully in future. The biosafety committee is seriously concerned
about this problem."
(Por Nao Nakanishi,
Planet Ark, 18/07/2006)