There are few places in Southeast Asia more remote than this forested plateau in southern Laos, but over the
decades, history seems to have chosen it as a battleground. During the Vietnam War, it was busy with the movement
of Vietnamese troops heading down the Ho Chi Minh Trail, and it became one of the most heavily bombed places on
earth.
These days it thunders to the dynamite of dam builders and the roar of construction equipment, some of it widening
and paving parts of the wartime trail just inside the border with Vietnam.For more than a decade, long before
construction began last year, the project has been the focus of a different kind of battle, which reflects the region s
economic transformation since the war. It is under vigorous attack from opponents concerned about the destructive
effects of dams, both on the balance of nature and on the surrounding population.
Now that it is well under way, critics say a number of important questions about those effects remain to be answered.
About 6,000 people will be displaced on the Nakai Plateau, which will be partly flooded, and the livelihoods of at least
100,000 more will be affected downstream. Those numbers are small compared with an estimated one million people
who have been displaced by the Three Gorges Dam, which has just begun operations in China.
The dam in Laos, called the Nam Theun 2, has become a test case, the first major dam backed by the World Bank
after a self-imposed moratorium in the mid-1990 s because of the concern over the environmental and human impact of
big dams. Together with its partner in the project, the Asian Development Bank, it is trying hard to prove that it can
meet the social and environmental standards set by its critics.
"If they fail, they will have an identity crisis and will have to rethink their development model," said Jean Foerster, the
social and environmental director for the Nam Theun 2 Power Company, which is carrying out the project. When it is
completed four years from now, the dam, on a tributary of the Mekong River, will address two pressing needs. It will
feed electricity to energy-hungry Thailand, its far more developed neighbor to the east, and it will instantly become a
major source of cash for Laos, one of the poorest countries in Asia.
For the first 25 years of operation, until the dam is turned over entirely to local control, the government will earn an
estimated $2 billion. "The sustainable development of hydropower is one of the few options the country has for
long-term growth and for further reducing poverty," said Haruhiko Kuroda, president of the Asian Development Bank,
when the two banks agreed to finance the project last year.
Some critics question even those basic goals, saying Thailand could find other, less disruptive, sources of power and
warning that the Laotian government cannot be counted on to use its windfall as promised, for social and economic
development. Supporters say no other dam project has taken such pains to mitigate potential destructive effects.
Hundreds of studies have been carried out over the years, examining everything from annual flood patterns to hardy
forms of grass for grazing. "We have recorded all the people having one banana tree," said Bernard Tribollet, the chief
executive officer of the Nam Theun 2 Power Company, describing the thoroughness of the research.
Even if the project falls short of its goals, the developers say, it is a better option than the more destructive, full-throttle
approach of countries like China, India and Vietnam. They say that if they were not damming the Nam Theun River,
one of those countries might well be doing it in their place with little regard for the environment or population. For a
project of that magnitude, though, experimentation, uncertainty and trial-and-error appear to be playing a significant
role. The livelihoods of displaced villagers, the effects on downstream rivers, the protection of wildlife and the role of the
government are all, despite the years of study, still works in progress.
"The main issues we are concerned about are the social impact, the environmental impact and then the overall costs
and benefits for the people of Laos and the ability of the government of Laos to manage a project as complex and risky
as Nam Theun 2," said Aviva Imhof, campaigns director of the International Rivers Network, a private monitoring group
that opposes dams. "Construction is proceeding on deadline," she said after a two-week visit to the area. "But the
social and environmental measures are lagging." That is the nature of the dam-building business, said Mr. Tribollet,
the projects chief executive. Certainty is impossible when man steps in so ambitiously to reconfigure nature and
social structures.
"The essence of a project is a series of problems," he said in an interview at the dam site. "And the success of the
project is dealing with these problems one after another. You are going to have problems. You deal with them one after
another." So even as the builders blast tunnels through the rock and prepare the ground for the 130-foot-high dam, the
Nakai Plateau has swarmed with carpenters and social workers, agronomists and anthropologists, foresters and
hydrologists, aquaculturists and geomorphologists.
As bridges, diversion channels and a huge power station take shape, new villages are being built away from the flood
zone, and the slash-and-burn farmers who must move into less fertile areas are being taught how to grow cabbage,
how to sell it, how to diversify their crops and how to handle the money they earn. It is a huge challenge in social and
economic engineering, said Mr. Foerster, the social and environmental director. "They have to adapt to new livelihoods
in a smaller area," he said. "It s not something we can do immediately. Its too much of a jump from their current
lifestyle."
He added: "Relocating a village is not only relocating houses and digging wells. Thats the easy part. Then you have to
think about schools, agriculture, forestry, cattle-raising. With this project you can address almost all the parameters of
the country." As the challenges have multiplied, so too have the uncertainties. On the plateau, they include the quality
of farmland for the displaced villagers, the suitability of grazing land for water buffalo and whether alternative crops and
sustainable fish farms can be developed, Ms. Imhof said.
Downstream, she said, there are questions about the impact of erosion and changed currents on fisheries and
farming, and about compensation for the loss of homes and livelihoods. Even if those issues are resolved, Ms. Imhof
said, "You can t pretend that this project is not in Laos" — a country of just six million people that has never
encountered an enterprise of that scope. The builders biggest gamble is their partnership with a government that has a
reputation for deep corruption and that lacks expertise to handle many of the financial and social aspects of the
project. The developers acknowledge that uncertainty as well.
"The beginning part is we have to trust the government to want to do the right thing," said WooChong Um, principal
operations specialist for the Asian Development Bank. "Thats why we are in there, to help them do what they should
do. There s a capacity issue involved. There s a huge degree of uncertainty."
As the project seeks to soften the impacts on the people, the wildlife, the rivers and the surrounding landscape, he
said: "Its really about choices. Its really about risks." If the Nam Theun 2 project succeeds in meeting these
challenges, he said, "it will send a huge signal to other countries that this kind of project is workable."
(Por Seth Mydans,
The NY
Times, 26/06/2006)